<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>woblog &#187; browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/tag/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>great stuff about the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google &#8220;Chrome&#8221; &#8211; now they have a Browser&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-now-they-have-a-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-now-they-have-a-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webapp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years of unfounded speculation, it appears that Google is actually getting into the web browser market. Later today they plan to release a Beta version (it&#8217;s always a Beta with Google) of &#8220;Chrome&#8220;. In a rather cute move, they have also published a cartoon explaining what it&#8217;s all about. Aside from the standard &#8216;Faster!&#8217;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years of unfounded speculation, it appears that Google <em>is</em> actually getting into the web browser market. Later today they plan to release a Beta version (it&#8217;s always a Beta with Google) of &#8220;<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html">Chrome</a>&#8220;. In a rather cute move, they have also published a <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/">cartoon</a> explaining what it&#8217;s all about.</p>
<p>Aside from the standard &#8216;Faster!&#8217;, &#8216;Simpler!&#8217;, &#8216;Safer!&#8217; claims, it looks like Chrome will make each browser tab a separate process, add offline support through their &#8216;<a href="http://gears.google.com/">Gears</a>&#8216; software, be cross-platform, and make it easier to run as an application without a URL bar. Why should you care? This will potentially allow webapps to behave more like regular applications &#8211; sitting on your desktop, and working even when not connected to the internet. If an application or site crashes, you won&#8217;t lose your other pages, and you will have a better idea what caused the problem.</p>
<p>On the other hand, some might say it also positions Google to become the new Microsoft, with users using a Google browser to access the growing range of Google applications (gMail, Docs, Talk, Calendar etc) instead of the Outlook and Office. We&#8217;ll have to wait and see.</p>
<p>&#8230;And in the spirit of unfounded speculation, hype, and tinfoil-hat suspicion, here is a classic story by Cory Doctorow about what might happen if Google really became all-pervasive: <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/09/google_fiction_evil_dangerous_surveillance_control_1.php">Scroogled</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-now-they-have-a-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 released</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/04/02/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/04/02/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/04/02/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear. It seems to me that as quickly as Microsoft release one version of their internet browser without properly making sure that all HTML and CSS will display consistently, they go ahead and release another version (albeit in beta). Interestingly though, this new release of IE seems to have a couple of snippets of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear. It seems to me that as quickly as Microsoft release one version of their internet browser without properly making sure that all HTML and CSS will display consistently, they go ahead and release another version (albeit in beta).</p>
<p>Interestingly though, this new release of IE seems to have a couple of snippets of good news for web developers.</p>
<p>The first is being the in-built HTML, CSS and Javascript debugger. Similar to a Firefox extension called <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/887" target="_blank">HTML Validator</a> that White October use to debug markup, the Internet Explorer 8 program will have a visual-environment-based Developer toolbar for this purpose. The only thing that concerns me with this is that, stereotypically, visitors who use Internet Explorer aren&#8217;t always technically-minded so may end up clicking on something when they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing; the result of this will be that the user may feel like they&#8217;ve got themselves into deep doo-doo. Possibly.</p>
<p>This next point will be a huge relief for web developers but will raise curiosity levels for the cynics like me, so here goes. Microsoft boasts that &#8220;many cross-browser inconsistencies will be fixed&#8217;.  This will hopefully free up so much time which developers spend checking their sites are cross-browser compatible and allow for one design to show on either (IE or Firefox) browsers. My cynical questions however, are, how many inconsistencies will be fixed and will they be fixed properly?</p>
<p>One last thing about IE8, completely unrelated to web development: it&#8217;s based on the new-look Office 2007 &#8216;ribbon&#8217; interface. Yay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/04/02/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

