<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>woblog &#187; sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/tag/sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>great stuff about the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why nuclear power is not a sustainable source of low carbon energy</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/07/08/why-nuclear-power-is-not-a-sustainable-source-of-low-carbon-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/07/08/why-nuclear-power-is-not-a-sustainable-source-of-low-carbon-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article by John Busby from a newsgroup I subscribe to : csrblokes arguing that nuclear fails as a sustainable energy source on 2 counts: To meet global energy demands today (let alone in the coming decades) we would need 20,000 new nuclear power stations, and there simply isn&#8217;t enough Uranium around to supply [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article by <a title="John Busby" href="http://www.after-oil.co.uk/jbcv.htm#jbusby">John Busby</a> from a newsgroup I subscribe to : <a href="http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/csrblokes/">csrblokes</a> arguing that nuclear fails as a sustainable energy source on 2 counts:</p>
<ol>
<li>To meet global energy demands today (let alone in the coming decades) we would need 20,000 new nuclear power stations, and there simply isn&#8217;t enough Uranium around to supply them with fuel &#8211; i.e. not sustainable</li>
<li>Uranium mining and refining emits more carbon than it saves for all but the very purest of ores &#8211; i.e. not a low carbon energy source</li>
</ol>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty convincing and damning article and makes a farce of this government&#8217;s energy policy.  Read the abridged version here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.depletion-scotland.org.uk/jb_nuclear.htm">http://www.depletion-scotland.org.uk/jb_nuclear.htm</a></p>
<p>and the full version here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.after-oil.co.uk/nuclear.htm">http://www.after-oil.co.uk/nuclear.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiteoctober.co.uk/blog/2008/07/08/why-nuclear-power-is-not-a-sustainable-source-of-low-carbon-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

